Semitism is a word that refers to Jewish advocacy or, what might be the same, underhanded Jewish supremacy. The word stems from Shem, a son of Noah in the Hebrew Bible, from which the word Semite, or a speaker of languages once attributed to the offspring of Shem, developed. Today, Semitic languages are more commonly understood to belong in the Afro-Asiatic language family, and include languages such as Arabic and Aramaic, as well as various forms of Hebrew and other languages of Northeastern Africa and the Levant, but they still maintain the Shemitic moniker. The Jewish people have become the sole representatives for Semitism in the West, where anti-Semitism does not typically refer to hatred of or opposition to Aramaics or Arabs or other such groups, as the term etymologically suggests, but almost exclusively of or to Jews. This ethnological fact places the ethnographic focus related to Semitism on Jews. Ethnography refers to the study of ethnic groups, but-- whereas the related ethnology is similarly the study of ethnic groups--, instead of studying them in relation to others, it involves more focused ethnic studies.
The origin of the Jewish people is not fully agreed upon.
The Ancient Hebrews are often traced back to the Hyksos and Habiru. Traditional Jewish lore states that Jews, properly-speaking, were Hebrew Israelites who had come from the Kingdom of Judah, which was named after a son of Jacob, who inherited the land from his father counter to the claim of Esau, owing to a dispute over a bowl of pottage wherein Esau half-heartedly and perhaps even jokingly, and unaware of a witness being present, agreed to pass his birthright on. Jew is said to come from Judah, and elsewhere has been written as Jud. Schlomo Sand, however, suggests that the identity is not clear, and has distanced himself from it. There has been some argument, such as from Sand and others, that this story is incomplete and that most Jews are actually converts or illegitimate by rabbinical standards owing to not sharing a heritage that appears to be exclusive to people in Canaan during this time, and in particular Jews. Controversially, Sand has even agreed that the often-cited-by-hatemongers Khazar hypothesis may have some merit.
The Khazar idea, often supported by anti-Semites, holds that some portion of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, commonly found in Europe, descend from the Khazar Empire, a multiethnic, religiously Jewish empire that controlled trade in Eastern Europe. After all, Jews not only count Turkic members among themselves, but also Babylonians, Ethiopians, Indians, and Chinese, among others, such that the ethnicity might be described as a nation rather than an ethnicity, because being something like a super-ethnicity.
Many Judahites, after their exile into Babylon, became known as Radhanites, a word likely referring to Babylon but that interestingly also has a few analogs in Europe. Radhanites, contemporaries of the Khazars, were known to be international traders and slavers of the Silk Road and Mediterranean who were fluent in many languages and interacted with peoples such as the early Germanic tribes, Slavic tribes such as the Rus, and others. The Radhanites and the Khazars were connected religiously and by commerce, if not by ethnicity. Both groups, while one apparently Babylonian and the other Turkic, were multilingual and probably mongrelized tradesmen. Like the later Gypsies, to whom they may be very distantly related along with the Jats, the Jews were an import into Europe as immigrants, and their role was particularly financial. In Europe, they occupied the Rhinelands, along with tribes such as the Franks, with whom they intermixed, and certainly had claim of lands of their own, perhaps especially along the banks of rivers, which may be a reason for financial centers today being called banks.
Jewish origins, then, may have includeded Khazars and even Radhanites to some extent. Still, there is a question as to whether there may be other, more traditionally Germanic, and so Japhetic or Indo-European sources for the origins of Jews, and in particular the Ashkenazi branch.
There may have been a foundation that pre-dated this Khazar-Radhanite excursion, which may be able to be uncovered linguistically. For instance, Ashkenaz is generally understood to be in Germany and perhaps to extend into Eastern Europe. The Northernmost part of the Germanic mainland was known as Jutland and was home to people known as Jutes. These Jutes were known to be relatives to the Gothic people, which here is understood widely so as to include Geats, Gotes, Gutes, and other people found in Scandinavia (especially Sweden), the Scythic Getae and Messagetae of the Caucasus, Central Asia, and Siberia, the Gutians of Iran, as well as the peoples who would become the Visigoths, Ostrogoths, etc. who conquered well into Europe and North Africa. Immediately, the similarity between Jud and Jute becomes obvious to anyone familiar with classic philology.
Interestingly, researchers on the history of a South Asian people, the Indian Jats, have drawn conclusions that the Jutes and the Goths were their relatives, such that there is a likely connection between the Jutes and the Jats. Even Karl Marx, when speaking of India, evokes “the type of the ancient German in the Jat.” The “Jattic Diaspora,” or “Old Jat Belt,” if we may refer to this wider category in this way, includes a wide range of ethnonyms, including Tat, Zut, Jut, and etc. Sometimes, the J is pronounced as if it were a Y, which has also been the case with the word Jew, which some have also said may be derived from the Yew tree. While there are not any other widespread instances of a Jattish ethnonym ending in a d rather than a t, Jats themselves consider themselves the descendents of Aryan or Scythian tribes including Goths and Sakas, and, in Aryan mathematics, it is understood that the numeral 1 is also equal phonetically to t and d, such that the two are tied linguistically and phonetically together at least in that tradition, a tradition that mirrors similar alpha-numeric characteristics found in Hebrew gematria. Hebrew is, of course, a Semitic and Afro-Asiatic language, rather than an Indo-Aryan language, but Jewish, Scythian, and Jattish people have long been known as being prone to multilingualism for the sake of mercantile endeavors along the Silk Road. Further, there have been linguistic arguments made that there is an underlying linguistic substrate to the Atlantic and Mediterranean languages-- often referred to as Atlanto-Mediterranean or Atlantic-- that may be Semitic or Afro-Asiatic in origin. Beyond this, there are in fact instances of t and d transliterating, as can be seen in the existence of the Jat gotra (clan) known as Jads or Jahds, whose name Hukum Singh Panwar, by way of Pt. Lekh Ram, in The Jats: Their Origin, Antiquity, and Migrations, has relayed speaks to Jat origins as descendents of Yadu, and which Ram suggests was the original version of the ethnonym, Jat, saying, as quoted by Panwar, that “Jats, in reality, are the descendents of Yadu, a name, which in the course of time, was distorted into Jadu, Jad and subsequently became Jatt or Jat.”
Another case that seems to tie Jews to the Jattish complex is the similarity in culture between the Jews and the Anabaptists of Europe, whose origins appear to be ethnically Gothic and whose Christianity was much more Jewish-like than that promoted by the Roman and Byzantine Catholic Churches. Anabaptists are, of course, the proto- or radical Protestant tradition from out of which the Amish, Mennonites, Hutterites, and other such entities come and are an expression of. They are characterized by plain dress that is very similar in some respects to the manner of dress of Orthodox Jews, and those of the Middle Ages, particularly if we allow for some divergence in cultural evolution. Further, the Anabaptists are a part of the larger tradition of primitive Christianity, alongside unitarian conceptions, and by extension may be said to be closer to the Jewish rather than the Roman expression of Christianity. They inhabit regions that are known to have become Gothic strongholds or which could easily have seen Gothic lineages permeate into since the time of the Iron Age. The Goths themselves had been known to also have been primitive Christians, having adopted a form of unitarianism known as Arianism, which was certainly an impact also on some later Anabaptists. Of course, the Anabaptists were never considered to be Jewish. It is worth noting that many of the opponents of Jews were of Gothic heritage, such that an evolutionary divergence of cultural drift between these groups is made quite serious by their separation. The claim that these groups share a genetic and cultural foundation is not intended to equate the two, but both to suggest remaining similarities as well as newer distinctions between them. Besides, the Gothic-Jattic Diaspora I mention was never itself monolithic, but always contained disperate elements within it.
The Goth connection being so, it would seem that Khazarian and Radhanite inputs into Ashkenazi Jewery would have also involved a mixture of Gothic or Jattic peoples, perhaps including those long having inhabited Germanic zones and those who may have come from more Iranic and Indian locations. This would suggest that the Jutes, Danes, Vikings, Normans, and Franks were potentially distant relatives to the Radhanite and Khazarian Jews, and that the Jewish Diaspora is part of a wider Gothic/Jattic Diaspora that may be considered an extended Jat Belt going from Northwest India, passing the Levant and the Black Sea, and up through Jutland into Scandinavia. This would do some work in explaining why Jewish-based Christianity was so quick to be taken up by the Franks and Jutes, though it had been resisted by the Saxons and Frisians, who held strong to their native pagan beliefs.
Whereas Catholics worship on Sunday, and the big holy day in Islam is on Friday, Jews and Sabbatarian Christians keep Sabbath on Saturday. Astrotheologically, the Catholic tradition is tied to Sun worship, Islam to Venus worship, and Judaism to Saturn. Saturn was also known as Cronos, and was connected to the passing of time and was depicted as a cannibal of his own children. Saturn is also where the name Satan comes from, who, astrotheologically as well as biblically, is understood to play the role of the Adversary, an archetype of one who hinders others. In Judaic Wisdom tradition, this role is not understood to be something that is opposed to God, but which ultimately serves God, as was depicted in the torments of Job. The astrotheological aspects of Judaism are likely from Chaldea or Babylon after the Jews had been taken from Israel. The Samaritans (and possibly the proto-Druze and others) in Northern Israel had previously been scattered into the Ten Lost Tribes, some of whom may have joined or become the Danes (Tribe of Dan) and Jutes.
The Babylonian Jews had split from the Samaritans and the Karaite Jews, who had been left to remain in Israel, and their new rabbinical tradition included aspects of Babylonian magic to it, seen in the Star of Remphan, colloquially known as the Star of David. Its beliefs were developed from a claim to a longstanding oral tradition, the exoteric version of which is found in the Talmud or so-called Oral Torah, the esoteric version being found later in the Kabbalah system and the Zohar. Rabbinical or post-rabbinical Jews are an ethnocentric group that refer to themselves as “the Chosen People” and their legendary or mythical place of ethnogenesis as “the Holy Land,” and who believe that they worship the only true God to the exclusion of others (otherwise, they claim that they are not religiously Jewish, but are secularly Jewish, meaning that they identify with Jewish ethnicity rather than the ethnic faith).
Rabbinical Judaism would be most famously challenged by Jesus Christ and Christianity, who had famously toppled the tables of the money-changers in the temples and warned that rich men were as likely as a camel passing through the eye of a needle to get into Heaven. Whereas the Rabbi Hillel had promoted the extension of the Golden Rule among Jews, and forbade the practice of usury against Jews, Jesus Christ extended the Golden Rule beyond ethnic bases, so as to include all Christians, whatever their ethnic origin. In this way, early Christianity's challenge to Judaism was the breaking down of ethnic particularism and the development of universal values. This would become the major distinction between the Western and Oriental worldview as well, the Jewish particularist orientation coming from the Orient. Jews can cease to be Jewish simply by claiming Christianity for their religion and/or by denouncing Jewish ethnic identity. Over time, Christian opposition to usury would weaken, however, and the Christian religion became corrupted by Judaic elements, allowing for the practice of usury by Christians.
Anti-Semitic acts of violence, or pogroms as they are known, have typically originated from out of the middle and lower class, though have also come from reactionary elements of the upper class from time-to-time, being a potential unifying factor for Western civilization that exists even across class boundaries. The Rhineland Jews were massacred by an army of peasants and artisans during the Rhineland Massacres, part of the People's Crusade, as led by Peter the Hermit, showing that anti-Semitism has proto-socialist foundations. This was during the agrarian age of feudalism. Similarly, during the industrial age of capitalism, there was a strong line of connection made between the two major questions of the day, the Labor Question and the Jewish Question.
Historically, we are told that Jews were forced into positions such as banker, moneylender, money changer, tax collector, executioner, slaver, and etc. by European royals and nobles, and that this is what led to the hatred of Jews and their association with financial domination and, eventually, capitalism, by Europeans. Thus, when the Jewish Question, or what to do with the status of Jews in newly republicanized and liberalized European society, came up, the Jews, in their traditional roles, was a major focus. Of course, the politically correct way to view Rothschild in his mansion, and ilk of his sort, is as a victim. His ilk was forced into the lucrative position of indebting European royals and nobility, you see. But the idea that Jews had entered into Europe with intentions other than pursuing their own interests is completely unfounded, and the interests of Jews seems to be clear by how the Radhanites and Khazars and their descendents acted. Jews established themselves in Europe as foreigners who were pursuing material gain and had no gumption about creating trade blockades, practicing slavery, usury, mercenary violence, piracy, and various other means in order to get it. In doing so, they were often going against the customs common to Europe, which has increasingly come to oppose legal particularism.
Again, Jews will argue that their banking privileges were actually a form a discrimination and hardship, owing to the fact that Christianity forbade Jews from owning land or participating in guilds and that Christians could not themselves practice usury, something most Jews and many gentiles today malevolently insist or erroneously believe is essential for the functioning of a market economy. But Jews, sometimes having titles such as servi camerae regis (“servants of the royal chamber”), had also at times been treated collectively like a corporate group, having particularistic legal treatment in an otherwise universalizing society, and were allowed to have their own courts and practice their own personal law within their ghettos, while others, such as atheists, pagans, modernizing Catholics, and Protestants, were not allowed these privileges. They were at times given privileges against Christians, such as having their word count for multiple Christians' word. They were often given rights of protection within castles. Not only were they often foreigners who were employed in work such as slaving, banking, executing, tax-collecting, and privateering, and who were associated with decadent trade with the Orient and sexual perversions, and not only were they given special privileges in court and castle, Jews were said to practice black magic witchcraft and to kill children. Much folklore developed around this, such that much of the existing folklore today is an echo of that about Jews. For example, in Disney titles, Snow White's witch, for example, is clearly a big-nosed Jew trading something decadent that is ultimately a trick. While Robin Hood's Maid Marian is not depicted in ethnic tones, she is clearly an analog for the Jewess who killed Little Hugh, though not Skippy, in this case, whose toy also went over the castle wall. Whether one personally agrees that these things took place, my depiction at the very least accurately showcases what a collection of Jewish-aware thought from the past might come together to depict in the minds of the commoner, or rustic folk, of whom I am an advocate.
Long after the People's Crusade and Rhineland Massacres, after the transition to industrial capitalism, but before the rise of fascism, socialism (here including anarchism) had been gaining sway. Socialism refers to that set of ideologies that were responding to and desired to resolve the Labor Question, or why it is that labor does not receive the full worth of its products. It especially refers to ideologies that were responding to industrial capitalism as a mode of production, which corresponded to the Enlightenment transition to liberal republicanism, rather than those retroactively identified as socialist during earlier periods. Socialism, from out of which sociology developed, was an analysis that came from developments in economics, such as the labor theory of value, which empirically and rationally demonstrated that interest, profit, and rent, as well as taxes, and any other form of economic surplus, were derived from misappropriated wages that would otherwise be paid to labor. Early socialists such as Charles Fourier, Pierre Proudhon, and Mikhail Bakunin expressed views in opposition to Semitism. To a large, though not complete, extent, the Labor and the Jewish Question were the same or overlapping questions. Socialists such as Proudhon had reduced the capitalist system to its banking mechanism, which was responsible for the unjust distribution of property and had called for remediation through restorative justice. It was widely understood at the time who the major bankers were, ethnically-speaking, such that socialism entailed, so far as Semitism involved advocacy for Jews even against others, what is now deemed anti-Semitism. This is not to suggest that all Jews are involved in or are beneficiaries of usury, but that usury was a phenomenon connected in earlier European times almost exclusively to Jews,a trend that some argue continues to this day.
Classic socialism would be deterred and co-opted by Marxism, and then even the remaining “anarchists” fractured into factions. In response to socialist internationalism, the ruling class elites, which had also been behind the destructive effort of Marxism, established its synarchy movement, which included financial, industrial, educational, religious, and military elites together in the mix, and combined Jewish and Christian and Marxist and capitalist interests idiosyncratically into a common effort of planist corporatism.
The synarchy includes not only formal Jews, but also especially Catholics and some Protestants who have aligned themselves with Jewish interests, and is more generally associated with the Great White Brotherhood. The Great White Brotherhood may have some connection to the White Huns or the Wusun or some other such Steppe tribe, if not directly to the Goths, but their tradition of meeting across tribal boundaries I have traced to the Yana of Mount Shasta, establishing it as very old if indeed contiguous. From out of modern synarchism, in which I include proto-fascist organizations and movements, developed a deep state that functioned as a clearinghouse for ruling class disputes, from out of which we saw develop first the League of Nations and then the United Nations and all of the other globalist power centers. Among the parties included were the various flavors of what would become fascism, including Zionism, Nazism, and Bolschevism, the arranged conflict of which was necessary in order to move the world to a more politically correct sensibility. This involved also open negotiations such as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the Haavara Agreement, which included cooperation between Nazis and Bolscheviks and Nazis and Zionists. Left-wing fascism would include efforts such as Stalinism, Maoism, Strasserism, post-Marxism, and neosocialism, while Right-fascism would feature the Nazis, Right-wing Zionism, and various regional forms of fascism, such as popularized in Italy and Spain and in South America, that stressed familial and national heritage. But this is unknowingly a polarized, agonistic arrangement much like the Democrats and Republicans or the Marxists and “anarcho”-capitalists, as all of the factions are ultimately led by the synarchy, which also has infiltrated the Democrats, Republicans, Greens, and Libertarians, and has co-opted even the most liberal sentiments into its clutches.
Jews are today's “forever victim.” We are indoctrinated in school into this sensibility, and most of us rarely come to question it. We have been shown what appear to be morally horrible and ethically attrocious photos of dead Jews killed by Nazis in gas chambers or starving in prison camps, and have been told that there were even lamps and couches composed from human Jewish leather, though their role in European society is usually avoided. Denial of the Holocaust has been made illegal in many countries, but there are some who suggest that this event, which arose shortly after or in concert with a wave of the Industrial Revolution that included the spread of telegraph and the invention of cinema, was entirely fabricated. Among them include the historian of American individualist anarchism, James J. Martin. Whether a fabrication, or whether brought upon themselves by their desire for collective treatment as a corporate group combined with immoral behaviors, Jews have been more than willing to milk this Holocaust event for their own benefit, and have been more than willing to use it to silence cultural and political opposition to Semitism. While much fuss is made about the Holocaust, it has been rivaled in size by the less famous Holdomor and Congo Extermination, among others. Further, much of World War II's multimillions of lives that were lost were lost in order to put an end to the idea that Jews were being killed, much as millions of lives were lost during the many Crusdades to “the Holy Land.” Still, the Holocaust is still used today as a blanket to protect Jews, Judaism, and all decadent things associated with them, such as usury and pornography, the criticism of which amounts to “anti-Semitism,” meaning, in this case, an offense to popular sentiments regarding “the Chosen People.” That's what those who died fighting for Jews really died for, insofar as these are the fruits of ending the Holocaust: the cessation of freedom of conscience, speech, and association in the name of not offending Jews. Jews have come out largely on top of this, such that, today, not only do they still have a major influence in financial, industrial, media, and political institutions, especially for their demography, they have retained legal privileges for themselves, largely in the form of anti-anti-Semitism or philo-Semitism laws, such as those against so-called “hate speech,” those that require one not oppose Jewish advocacy or else demand Jewish support. Again, anti-anti-semitism is the demand for legal particularism by an ethnocentric group that organizes and bargains in a corporate fashion. Universal legal treatment would extend the principle of Equal Freedom such that if any ethnic group cannot be criticized, none can. Yet, we know today that Anglo-Saxons,“Aryans,” or non-Jewish “white people” more generally are considered to be prime targets for exclusion, being unable to organize for their own interests as intersectional interests do without recourse, and that this has made working class non-Jewish white men more-or-less into a neo-Dalit caste in American discourse, a racial caste that is not allowed to publicly advocate for or assemble toward their interests without punishment.
This is total enmeshment syndrome resulting from an attachment disorder in white people and coinciding with narcissistic factitiousness of Jews as a cultural group (though this may not apply to individual Jews). Enmeshment traditionally refers to a psychological state in which the interpersonal boundaries between individuals has been broken down, such that the hardships of one are experienced as the hardships of the other. Enmeshment can exist in a more reciprocal condition of codependency, but more often involves dependency and functions in a unilateral fashion. Enmeshment is typical of narcissistic family dynamics, and can be easily played upon by factitious forces. Factitiousness refers to a psychological state in which one feigns or accepts real hardship in order to receive some perceived benefit from others, such as focused attention, co-rumination, money, fame, or etc. Individuals experiencing interpersonal factitious disorder may do things such as purposefully harming themselves or loved ones in order to become a center of attention and recipient of affection and support. They may also create the illusion that these bad things have happened, and so forgo any real hardship, but fake it, in order to receive the perceived benefits that they expect to follow. Enmeshed individuals have a difficult time advocating for their own interests and easily become echoists or automatons of the narcissist and advocate for the interests of the narcissist instead of their own. The idea that Jews should be privileged owing to past wrongs caused to them, which have either been fabricated or were self-induced, is classic factitiousness. The going along with this narrative by automatons and echoists is very much an enmeshment by factitious narcissism.
As an extension of Semitistic factitiousness, intersectional enmeshment has been weaponized, an enmeshment with the interests of Jews by other minorities, sexual deviants, and interested women. That is, Jews have successfully garnered world favor through factitious use of the Holocaust by enmeshing society into their victim-oriented, narcissistic communitarianism and collectivism. But Jews have garnered the support of others, including those with white guilt who are prone to white knighting as a result to criticism from the intersectional cultural embargo. These individuals function as echoists and automatons for intersectional interests, as led especially by Jews, and are especially enmeshed because organized against the interests of their own group, much as a narcissistically-abused and enmeshed individual will sacrifice their own interests for the sake of addressing the narcissist's factitious demands. This seems to be a uniquely white phenomenon, at least here in the United States, because all other groups tend to focus either on universal interests, along with other whites, or else to focus on their own, rather than others', particularistic interests. It seems the parity between intersectional factitiousness and white enmeshment has a lot to do also with attempts of white redemption through noble acts, which manifest in pious sentiments toward Jews, whose factitious claims are not only believed and sincerely felt, but also serve as a means to moral salvation. Anyone who speaks out against factitious Semitistic or intersectional interests today is banned, deplatformed, cancelled, censored, etc. Even honest scientists who have spoken out against organized Jewry and its stranglehold, such as Kevin MacDonald, have been silenced. White workers are treated as if an inequality in detriment or in virtue is a privilege, rather than treating them as if they should be detriment-free and virtuous. If one is involved in class organizing, one will almost certainly run into philo-Semitism and will quickly learn that anti-Semitism, apparently also known as class reductionism, is not to be tolerated.
For all of their concerns expressed about the Holocaust, Jews' statist claim to Palestine and their celebration of the extermination of others is oddly a point of celebration and demarcation. Even in the United States, Jews often set their homes apart from their neighbors by hanging a mezuzah, letting fellow Jews and those in-the-know that a Jew resides there. When the Egyptians' first-born were slaughtered by what the the Gnostics, including those in Egypt, believed to be the Demiurge, or secondary malevolent or mistaken power, worshipped by the Hebrews, during what is called Passover, the Hebrew people had demarcated themselves by placing a lamb's blood on their doorposts, signifying they were among the Demiurge's Chosen People, and that they were to be spared from the slaughter. This is recalled in the form of current mezuzahs, which instead of being lamb's blood are scrolls that are typically blessed by rabbis. It demonstrates the household to belong to one of the Chosen People, much the same.
What we have seen is that Semitism, at least in its recent and socially-defended form, is an ethnographic factitious response, utilizing interracial enmeshment, to defeat genuine (non-Marxist) socialism. In other words, Jews, in response to the development of socialism, and as practitioners of usury and the spearhead to capitalism, and alongside the use of the Trojan Horse Marxism, used the Holocaust to derail socialism, by utilizing it in a factitious manner (whether real or imagined) and narcissistically enmeshing others into their theatrical or self-induced trauma.
While Jews have been the focus of this paper, this is not to suggest that they alone exclusively control the ruling class or its elite, though they may be the leading or uniting element. There are also, of course, Gothic, Anglo-Saxon, and Frankish elites who have since been incorporated, especially those who may have royal, noble, aristocratic, financialist, or industrialist backgrounds. Further, there have been many important contributions to society by Jews, and many Jews have maintained honest sources of employment. Many Europeans, for instance, might show gratitude for deli favorites, many of which have Jewish origins or were popularized by Jewish merchants and shopkeepers. Still more, Ancient Jews such as John the Baptist and perhaps Jesus were important spiritual leaders in Christian history, and modern Jews such as Baruch Spinoza have even been important influences on the author of this paper, who holds this particular Jewish heretic in high esteem. As I hope I have demonstrated, I believe that cultures and individuals within them can diverge and drift or transcend their current positions. As a result, I am not suggesting that pogroms or holocausts are a proper solution to this problem. Instead, I am asking for a tempering of Jewish and other Gothic sources of social organization with that of the Saxon, and the placing of collectivistic and particularistic concerns under the premises of individual liberty and universal values, and for anarchy, the absence of political control by any culture, an effort that has already evolved in the form of mutualism, as I have written elsewhere.